Qatar Airways delays 787-9 Dreamliner delivery due to new Qsuite design

Oct 22, 2019

This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. Terms apply to the offers listed on this page. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.

Qatar Airways announced that the delivery of its first Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner aircraft has been delayed due to difficulties in installing a modified version of its Qsuite business-class seat.

The Gulf carrier already has what is widely regarded as the world’s best business-class product on select Boeing 777 and Airbus A350 aircraft. Its fleet of Boeing 787-8 aircraft is currently fitted with its previous generation reverse herringbone business-class seat. Qatar has previously said it would install a modified version of the seat in its 789 fleet due to the cabin being slightly narrower than the 777 and A350 cabins in its fleet.

The first Dreamliners to receive the new Qsuite are the 787-9 variant, of which Qatar has 30 on order. The first of these is ready to be delivered, but Qatar CEO Akbar Al Baker told Alex Macheras that the aircraft cannot yet enter service because the seat is “not quite ready”. Al Baker has revealed few details of the seat only describing it as “a new variant, next-generation Qsuite”. Though the 777 and A350 seat is quite heavy, the new 787 Qsuite seat will be at least 22% lighter in weight.

The airline’s Airbus A380 aircraft were originally planned to also receive a modified Qsuite seat as part of the refurbishment programme, though this plan has been abandoned, as the airline will retire these aircraft within the next five years.

One of the most unique features of the airline’s current Qsuite cabin is the unique quad seats, where four passengers can sit together.

(Photo by Nick Ellis/The Points Guy)
(Photo by Nick Ellis/The Points Guy)

TPG reached out to Qatar Airways to ask if features like the quad seats would remain in the new 787-9 cabin but did not hear back by time of publication.

Featured photo by Steve Parsons/Getty Images)

Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Disclaimer: The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser’s responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.